Case 1303150/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Afzal v Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303150/2022
- Decision date
- 18 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr D McIntosh, Mr K Palmer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Afzal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs A Afzal brought four complaints against Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust: unfair dismissal; discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010; failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010; and unauthorised deductions from wages under sections 13 and 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The hearing was held in Birmingham on 10, 11, 12 and 15 April 2024, with 16 April 2024 in chambers and 17 April 2024 before the judge alone in chambers. The tribunal consisted of Employment Judge Kenward with Mr D McIntosh and Mr K Palmer as members.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Complaint under the Employment Rights Act 1996, sections 98 and 111. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint framed as discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint framed as failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint under the Employment Rights Act 1996, sections 13 and 23. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.