Case 1303152/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T M Turton v Wood Green Nursing Home Limited FINAL HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303152/2021
- Decision date
- 28 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T M Turton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Miss T M Turton was unfairly dismissed by Wood Green Nursing Home Limited. The claimant sought compensation only. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
On remedy, the tribunal recorded that any compensation for lost earnings would be reduced to a maximum of 4 weeks' pay under the Polkey principle. It also stated that both the basic award and any compensatory award were reduced by 100% under sections 122(2) and 123(6) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, leaving no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair. The claimant sought compensation only. Any compensation for lost earnings was said to be reduced to a maximum of 4 weeks' pay under the Polkey principle, and both the basic award and any compensatory award were reduced by 100% under sections 122(2) and 123(6) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £0 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Polkey principle
- s.122(2) ERA 1996
- s.123(6) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.