Case 1303163/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Kosinski v Unipart Group Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303163/2022
- Decision date
- 4 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Kosinski
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Birmingham on 3 July 2024, Employment Judge Camp heard the parties in case numbers 1303163/2022, 1303229/2022 and 1307861/2022. The respondent applied to strike out claim 1303229/2022 on the basis of alleged non-compliance with section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996.
That application was refused because the tribunal found that the claimant had complied with section 18A by going through early conciliation between 15 May 2022 and 20 June 2022. The tribunal therefore did not strike out the claim on that ground.
The claimant's application to debar Make UK from representing the respondent was also refused. The extracted judgment records only these preliminary procedural rulings and contains no merits findings or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Respondent's application to strike out claim 1303229/2022 on grounds of non-compliance with section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 was refused because the claimant had gone through early conciliation from 15 May 2022 to 20 June 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claimant's application to debar Make UK from representing the respondent was refused. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.