Case 1303164/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1303164/2018
- Decision date
- 12 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Birmingham on 12 August 2019, Employment Judge Gaskell held that the claimant had substantially failed to comply with the Unless Order made by Employment Judge Lloyd on 8 May 2019. The tribunal applied Rule 38(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and struck out the claim. The judgment records that the struck-out claim was dismissed and that the final hearing listed for 23 to 26 September 2019 would not go ahead.
The written record does not contain any merits findings on the underlying complaints. The case context identifies the pleaded claims as whistleblowing, race discrimination and unfair dismissal, but the judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' and does not separate the outcome by cause of action. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the tribunal noted that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Underlying complaint inferred from the case listing/context; the judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' being struck out for non-compliance with the Unless Order. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Underlying complaint inferred from the case listing/context; the judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' being struck out for non-compliance with the Unless Order. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Underlying complaint inferred from the case listing/context; the judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' being struck out for non-compliance with the Unless Order. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.