Case 1303171/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Price v Worcester Cycle Centre Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303171/2023
- Decision date
- 8 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Price
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing in Birmingham on 7 August 2023, before Employment Judge Hindmarch, the tribunal held that Mr J Price's claim of unfair dismissal against Worcester Cycle Centre Ltd was well founded. Mr Silvester appeared for the claimant and Mr Summers for the respondent.
The judgment records a basic award of £3,132. It also awards a further £2,088, described as four weeks' pay, because the respondent failed to issue written particulars of employment, with that uplift made under s.38 Employment Act 2002. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment is £5,220.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal awarded a basic award of £3,132 and a further £2,088 described as four weeks' pay for the respondent's failure to issue written particulars of employment, under s.38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £5,220 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,220
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,132
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,088
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.