Case 1303175/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Daley (Lay Representative) For the v Miss A Jervis (Advocate) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303175/2021
- Decision date
- 30 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Daley (Lay Representative) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Gaskell at Birmingham on 30 September 2022. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay in both claims were presented within time, and that the Employment Tribunal had jurisdiction to consider them.
The tribunal also found that the disability discrimination claim, the failure to make reasonable adjustments claim, and the victimisation claim in case number 1304627/2021 were presented out of time. It held that it had no jurisdiction to consider those claims and they were accordingly dismissed.
No merits findings on the wages or holiday pay claims are recorded in this judgment, and no remedy or compensation figure was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Held to have been presented within time; the tribunal said it had jurisdiction to consider the claim. This was a preliminary hearing and no merits decision or monetary award was recorded. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Held to have been presented within time; the tribunal said it had jurisdiction to consider the claim. This was a preliminary hearing and no merits decision or monetary award was recorded. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The disability discrimination claim, including the failure to make reasonable adjustments complaint, in case number 1304627/2021 was found to have been presented out of time and the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation claim in case number 1304627/2021 was found to have been presented out of time and the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.