Case 1303204/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Cerco Trainers Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303204/2021
- Decision date
- 20 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow On
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting remotely by CVP at Birmingham on 19 and 20 April 2022 before Employment Judge Dimbylow, heard the claimant in person and the respondent by lay representative. In its judgment it found that Mr P Leeson was unfairly dismissed by Cerco Trainers Limited.
The written judgment does not set out detailed reasoning beyond that finding. It records only the tribunal’s conclusion on liability and the financial order made as a result.
The respondent was ordered to pay compensation of £2,118.52, described in the judgment as one month’s net salary. No separate basic award, compensatory breakdown, interest award, or other remedy figure is given in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and orders compensation of £2,118.52, described as one month’s net salary. | Upheld | — | £2,119 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,119
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,119
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.