Case 1303205/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Alexandra Clay v Norton Armouries Film Ltd. — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303205/2023
- Decision date
- 24 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S. Evans
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Alexandra Clay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment, dated 24 August 2023, was a remedy decision in Alexandra Clay's claim against Norton Armouries Film Ltd. It records that the hearing took place by CVP at Birmingham before Employment Judge S. Evans sitting alone, with the Claimant appearing in person and no appearance for the Respondent.
The tribunal found that the Respondent failed to comply with section 80G(1) Employment Rights Act 1996 in relation to the Claimant's application for flexible working. It ordered the Respondent to pay compensation equivalent to 8 weeks' gross pay, assessed at £3,680.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flexible working | The tribunal found that the Respondent failed to comply with section 80G(1) Employment Rights Act 1996 in relation to the Claimant's application for flexible working. | Upheld | — | £3,680 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,680
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,680
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.80G(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.