Case 1303228/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Jones v Fowlers Finance.Com Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1303228/2018
- Decision date
- 12 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
- Venue
- The
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr N Jones did not attend the hearing on 1 November 2019 and gave no reason for his non-attendance. The respondent was represented by Mr D Mayor, its managing director, who provided a witness statement, a small bundle of documents and oral evidence.
Employment Judge Cookson was satisfied on that material that the claimant had been properly dismissed for gross misconduct. The judgment also records that he had no entitlement to notice. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims.
The written judgment does not set out separate findings for each pleaded claim, but the overall outcome was dismissal of all claims before the tribunal. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment does not separate the claims individually, but it records that the claimant's claims were dismissed after the tribunal found he was properly dismissed for gross misconduct and had no entitlement to notice. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The written judgment does not separate the claims individually, but it records that the claimant's claims were dismissed after the tribunal found he was properly dismissed for gross misconduct and had no entitlement to notice. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.