Case 1303235/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mitchell Lee v West Midlands Fire Service PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303235/2022
- Decision date
- 20 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mitchell Lee
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in private by CVP on 19 December 2023, Employment Judge Camp recorded a judgment by consent. The order stated that all of the claimant's complaints, including the whole of claims 1303235/2022, 1300109/2023 and 1303290/2023, were dismissed upon withdrawal under rules 51 and 52, except for the complaints listed in paragraph 2.
The complaints listed as not withdrawn or dismissed were a complaint of unfair dismissal and complaints of victimisation arising from the respondent's conduct in the claimant's September 2023 dismissal appeal, including allegations that key witnesses and evidence were ignored and that no further investigation was carried out in relation to other relevant witnesses. The extract contains no merits findings on those remaining complaints and records no financial award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to rules 51 and 52; the judgment did not set out separate merits findings for this complaint. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to rules 51 and 52; the judgment did not set out separate merits findings for this complaint. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.