Mr S Green v Birmingham City Council — 2023

Case reference: 1303267/2022
Decision date: 14 December 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Maxwell
Panel members: Mrs Ahmad, Mr Reeves

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr S Green

Respondent

Birmingham City Council

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal dismissed the Claimant's claim of discrimination arising from disability, finding it was not well-founded.

The tribunal upheld the Claimant's claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments. It awarded compensation comprising injury to feelings, loss of earnings, and interest on both heads of loss, for a total award of £8,123.66.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	Claim of discrimination arising from disability was found not well-founded and dismissed.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	Claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments was well-founded and succeeded.	Upheld	Disability	£8,124

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £8,124; across all upheld claims
Compensatory award: £4,202; compensatory remedy recorded

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.