Case 1303280/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Freeman v Staffordshire Leisure Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303280/2021
- Decision date
- 4 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Freeman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend the hearing or send a representative. The tribunal proceeded in its absence and considered the information available to it.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr S Freeman £651.85 gross. The written record notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. It also records that income tax and national insurance contributions may be payable and that any appropriate deductions and payment to the proper authorities would discharge the judgment to the extent of the net sum paid.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent did not attend or be represented; the tribunal proceeded in its absence. | Upheld | — | £652 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £652
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.