Case 1303285/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Sophie Mair v Learn By Design Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) FINAL HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303285/2023
- Decision date
- 16 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Sophie Mair
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing on 16 October 2023, heard in public by CVP before Employment Judge Camp, the respondent did not appear. The tribunal found that Miss Sophie Mair was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,057.70.
The tribunal also found that when her employment ended she was entitled to compensation for accrued but untaken annual leave in the sum of £740.38. Those entitlements were used in the final calculation, together with £1,000 already paid by the respondent and £54.80 paid by the Insolvency Service.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £743.28 in total. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,057.70. | Upheld | — | £1,058 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that on termination the claimant was entitled to compensation for accrued but untaken annual leave of £740.38. | Upheld | — | £740 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £743
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.