Case 1303301/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Martin Devaney v Midway Care Group Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303301/2023
- Decision date
- 14 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Martin Devaney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal upheld Mr Martin Devaney's claim of constructive unfair dismissal against Midway Care Group Ltd pursuant to s95 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The written judgment records only the result and remedy. It states that the total remedy due to the claimant, comprising basic and compensatory award, is GBP 15,376.84 and that the recoupment provisions do not apply. The judgment notes that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of constructive unfair dismissal pursuant to s95 Employment Rights Act 1996 is upheld. Written reasons are not provided in the extracted text because reasons were given orally. | Upheld | — | £15,377 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,377
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s95 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.