Case 1303312/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. S. Brittenden, counsel For the v Mr W. Lane, Peninsula Business Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303312/2016
- Decision date
- 7 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodman Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. S. Brittenden, counsel For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was a home support assistant employed by Sevacare from 12 June 2010. After Sevacare’s Haringey contract ended on 26 July 2016, there was a transfer to new providers under TUPE. The claimant was told verbally that Premier Carewaiting was to be her new employer, but she was never contacted by Premier, even though her name appeared on a schedule of hours and clients sent to the respondent by the union.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in the context of the TUPE transfer. The reasons record that, if dismissal was found, the parties did not dispute that it was unfair and had agreed the amount of the award, but the figure is not set out in the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.95 Employment Rights Act 1996
- TUPE regulation 4.1
- TUPE regulation 4.9
- TUPE regulation 7(1)
- Hogg v Dover College
- Sandle v Adecco
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.