Case 1303326/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Kaur v Testerworld Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303326/2022
- Decision date
- 3 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Kaur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent had not presented a response and the judge decided the complaint could properly be determined on the available material. The claimant complained under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 that the respondent had failed to comply with section 188 in respect of her dismissal.
The Tribunal found that, as at 9 May 2022, the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at its Hainge Park, Tividale, Oldbury depot, and that the claimant was an affected employee who was dismissed as redundant on that date. It found there was no recognised independent trade union for the relevant employees, no existing representatives with authority to be consulted, and no section 188 representatives elected because the respondent did not invite the affected employees to elect them.
The Tribunal found the section 189 complaint well founded. It was satisfied there had been no consultation at all, that no special circumstances had been shown, and that there were no mitigating circumstances. Having regard to the seriousness of the default and the guidance in GMB v Susie Radin Ltd, it made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 9 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award complaint under sections 188 and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; the locked taxonomy has no specific protective award or collective consultation category. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 21
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.