Case 1303337/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Brown v John Munroe Group Limited (In Administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303337/2023
- Decision date
- 18 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Brown
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with s.188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. Mr S Brown’s complaint was therefore well-founded and succeeded.
For remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for the protected period. It recorded that the protected period started on 1 June 2022 and continued for 90 days, and that the claimant’s weekly pay was £296.
The judgment also states that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply. No discrimination, dismissal, or other separate claim is identified in the decision text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found a failure to comply with s.188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and ordered remuneration for the protected period. The judgment states weekly pay of £296 and that the protected period lasted 90 days; the award is therefore calculated from those figures. | Upheld | — | £3,806 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,806
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.