Case 1303359/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Ms D Nkodia (2) Mr A Asiegbu v Emma Bridgewater Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303359/2022
- Decision date
- 6 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cuthbert
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Ms D Nkodia (2) Mr A Asiegbu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this judgment on withdrawal under rule 52, Employment Judge Cuthbert recorded that the First Claimant, Ms D Nkodia, had brought a complaint of unfair dismissal and the Second Claimant, Mr A Asiegbu, had brought complaints of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal. Those claims were dismissed because the Claimants withdrew them.
The judgment states that the Claimants' remaining claims of discrimination and victimisation, including complaints of discriminatory dismissal and discriminatory constructive dismissal, would proceed to a full hearing. No substantive findings were made on those remaining claims in this judgment, and no remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | First Claimant (Ms D Nkodia). The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint following withdrawal by the Claimants. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Second Claimant (Mr A Asiegbu). The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint following withdrawal by the Claimants. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Second Claimant (Mr A Asiegbu). The tribunal dismissed the wrongful dismissal complaint following withdrawal by the Claimants. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.