Case 1303359/2024 · Employment Tribunal
M S Mungiu v George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 1303359/2024
- Decision date
- 18 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walker Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M S Mungiu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, M S Mungiu, brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust. The case was heard at Birmingham on 17 and 18 February 2025 before Employment Judge Walker, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the complaint. The written judgment records only the dispositive finding that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded. No written reasons are included in the public record attached to this decision, and the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
No monetary award was made. The decision does not record any split remedy or any other financial order, so the bottom-line position is that the claim was dismissed without compensation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.