Case 1303377/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Alice Wright v The Boathouse — 2021
- Case reference
- 1303377/2021
- Decision date
- 26 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hena Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Alice Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Alice Wright brought claims arising from the ending of her employment with The Boathouse. The tribunal found that she had not been given a copy of her contract and accepted her evidence that she sought guidance from managers about notice. It found that an authorised manager, Thomas, told her she had to give four weeks' notice, and that this instruction formed part of the contractual arrangements between the parties. The tribunal also noted that the statutory minimum notice would otherwise have been one week under section 86 ERA.
The tribunal found that the claimant gave notice on 26 April 2021 and that her employment came to an end on 16 May 2021, taking account of her agreed unavailability from 20 May 2021 because she was moving to Durham. WhatsApp messages, which the respondent accepted had been sent, led the tribunal to find that she was willing to work in May 2021 and had offered to work two weekends during the notice period. It accepted her ET1 figure of £458 monthly earnings and calculated an hourly rate of £9.54, then assessed the notice-pay loss at £228.96 gross for the two weekends she was available to work.
The tribunal found no evidence to quantify any further loss, including the debt said to have been owed to the claimant's mother. It therefore awarded £228.96 gross for the unpaid notice pay and a further £228.96 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because the respondent had not provided a written statement of employment particulars. The judgment records that both sums were gross and that the claimant was responsible for any tax and National Insurance deductions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that Thomas, an authorised manager, told the claimant she had to give four weeks' notice and treated that oral instruction as part of the contract. The notice-pay award was not split between this claim and the overlapping wages claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that notice pay was unpaid for the relevant notice period and awarded gross pay on that basis. The judgment did not separately apportion the monetary award between the overlapping contract and wages claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £458
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £458
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- implied contractual right to reasonable notice of termination
- section 86 ERA
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.