Case 1303382/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Peter Bailey v Openreach Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303382/2022
- Decision date
- 24 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy KC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Peter Bailey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claims brought under the Employment Rights Act 1996 because it was reasonably practicable for those claims to have been brought in time.
The claim was dismissed. Oral reasons were given, and the written judgment states that written reasons would not be produced unless requested under Rule 62(3).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that claims brought under the Employment Rights Act 1996 were out of time and that the claim is dismissed. The gov.uk listing category is Unfair Dismissal; oral reasons were given and no written reasons are included. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.