Case 1303394/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303394/2021
- Decision date
- 8 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr N Forward, Ms LS Clark
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final merits hearing in Birmingham on 6-8 July 2022, the tribunal recorded that Mr R M Palmer was not discriminated against in contravention of Part 5 of the Equality Act 2010. His complaints of direct race discrimination and indirect race discrimination were both dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal, stating that it was not well founded. A further complaint under sections 188-189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was not pursued because the claimant accepted the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination complaint dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Indirect race discrimination complaint dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Complaint found not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.