Case 1303408/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Both in person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303408/2021
- Decision date
- 30 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Both in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone, heard the final merits hearing for Mr D Steers and Ms A Briscoe on 28 to 30 November 2022. The only outcome recorded in the judgment is that each claimant complained that they had been unfairly dismissed by UPS Limited, with the dismissals said to have taken place on 9 April 2021 and 7 April 2021 respectively.
Employment Judge Perry held that the complaints were not well founded and dismissed them. No separate remedy was awarded and the judgment does not record any split of compensation or any monetary award. The text supplied for the judgment contains no additional findings beyond the dismissal of the unfair dismissal complaints.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that Mr D Steers and Ms A Briscoe each complained of unfair dismissal arising from dismissals on 9 April 2021 and 7 April 2021 respectively; both complaints were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.