Case 1303450/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Banag v Toptec Dent Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1303450/2019
- Decision date
- 19 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wynn-Evans Claimant
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Banag
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 16 September 2019 in Birmingham, Employment Judge Wynn-Evans heard the claim from Miss A Banag, who appeared in person. The respondent, Toptec Dent Ltd, did not appear. The tribunal made its decision in the absence of the respondent and recorded four separate awards in the judgment.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract and ordered the respondent to pay £1,482 by way of breach of contract damages. It also found that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment under section 135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded £850.
In addition, the tribunal held that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction of wages by failing to pay wages as they fell due during 2019, and awarded £1.71 under section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal further ordered £464.10 as compensation related to entitlement to leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £1,482 as breach of contract damages. | Upheld | — | £1,482 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment under section 135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £850. | Upheld | — | £850 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction of wages for failure to pay wages as they fell due during 2019 and awarded £1.71 under section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £2 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal ordered £464.10 as compensation related to entitlement to leave pursuant to regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £464 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,798
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 135 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.