Case 1303467/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Baker v Aegis Moto Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303467/2019
- Decision date
- 30 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Baker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an open preliminary hearing held via CVP at Birmingham Employment Tribunal on 30 October 2020 before Employment Judge Mark Butler. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal’s determination was limited to status and jurisdiction.
The tribunal found that Ms E Baker did not satisfy the definition of employee or worker and was an independent contractor. On that basis, the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear her claims.
All claims brought by the claimant were dismissed. The extracted judgment does not identify the individual causes of action by name, nor does it record any monetary remedy or award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the individual claim types in the extracted text. It states that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction because the claimant did not satisfy the definition of employee or worker and was an independent contractor. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.