Case 1303496/2019 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Mr T Lang (solicitor) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1303496/2019
- Decision date
- 12 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Birmingham hearing on 12 November 2019, Employment Judge Perry recorded by consent that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract without the required notice. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,000 gross as damages for that breach.
The judgment also disposed of the holiday pay issue by withdrawal. The respondent had agreed not to seek recovery of any overpayment of holiday pay, and the claimant's holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal.
The claimant's sex discrimination/harassment complaint was likewise dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment states that the claimant's case was said to be solely by reference to race, and that the race discrimination/harassment complaints were unaffected by the withdrawals.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | By consent, it was agreed that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract without the required notice, and the respondent was ordered to pay the agreed sum of £1,000 gross as damages. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent agreed not to seek to recover any overpayment of holiday pay, and the claimant's holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The claimant's sex discrimination/harassment complaint was dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment also records that the claimant said her complaint was solely by reference to race, and that the race discrimination/harassment complaints were unaffected by the withdrawals. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.