Case 1303504/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Pincher The v Mr T Long and Miss S Smith trading as Crowning Glory Hair Design — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303504/2019
- Decision date
- 27 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Pincher The
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal joined Mr T Long and Miss S Smith to the proceedings because the case had originally named only Crowning Glory Hair Design, which was a trading name. It then found that the claimant's claims for statutory redundancy pay, damages for breach of contract, and unpaid holiday pay were well founded.
The tribunal ordered payment of £3,400.08 in respect of the claimant's statutory redundancy payment under s 135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, £1,700.04 for 12 weeks' notice under s 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and £1,586.70 for unpaid holiday entitlement under the Working Time Regulations 1998. In addition, because the proceedings related to jurisdictions listed in Schedule 5 of the Employment Act 2002 and the respondents were in breach of their duty to the claimant under section 1(1) and 4(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 when proceedings began, the award was increased by a further two weeks' pay of £283.34 under s 38(3)(b) of the Employment Act 2002.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment under s 135 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £3,400 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded for 12 weeks' notice under s 86 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,700 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement under the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £1,587 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,970
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- s 135 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s 86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998
- s 38(3)(b) Employment Act 2002
- Schedule 5 Employment Act 2002
- s 1(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s 4(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.