Case 1303514/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Davis v Testerworld Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303514/2022
- Decision date
- 31 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Davis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent had not presented a response and the judge considered that the collective consultation complaint could be determined on the available material. The claimant complained under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 in respect of her dismissal.
The Tribunal found that, as at 9 May 2022, the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at the Hainge Park, Tividale, Oldbury depot. The claimant was an affected employee and was dismissed as redundant on 22 July 2022. There was no recognised independent trade union for the relevant employees, no existing authorised employee representatives, and no election of representatives for section 188 purposes because the respondent did not invite affected employees to elect them.
The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 and had not shown special circumstances making compliance not reasonably practicable. Having regard to the seriousness of the default and the guidance in GMB v Susie Radin Ltd, the Tribunal found that there had been no consultation at all and no mitigating circumstances, and made the maximum protective award of 90 days' remuneration beginning on 22 July 2022. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed after being withdrawn by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award claim under sections 188 and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded; award was remuneration for 90 days from 22 July 2022, but no monetary figure was stated. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed, having been withdrawn by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 21
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A(1) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.