Case 1303516/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Rahima Begum v Likewize Services UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303516/2022
- Decision date
- 24 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Rahima Begum
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 11 August 2023, the tribunal gave Rahima Begum an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The tribunal identified two grounds: non-compliance with its order of 14 February 2023, which had been served on 15 March 2023 and required the claimant to send the respondent a copy of all documents in her possession or control, and the fact that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. It recorded that the hearing listed for 16 October 2023 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant did not comply with the order dated 14 February 2023, served on 15 March 2023, requiring disclosure of documents, and did not actively pursue the case. The tribunal also recorded that the claimant failed to make sufficient written representations or request a hearing in response to the strike-out warning letter dated 11 August 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.