Case 1303519/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Razvan Grigore v CTR Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303519/2021
- Decision date
- 13 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Power
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Razvan Grigore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Power on 12 and 13 September 2022, found that Mr Razvan Grigore had been constructively unfairly dismissed by CTR Group Limited. It ordered a basic award of £1,056, a compensatory award of £1,239, and £400 for loss of statutory rights. The judgment also records that recoupment of benefits did not apply because the claimant did not claim or receive any benefits.
The claimant’s unlawful deduction from wages claims, which were pleaded in respect of holiday pay, parking tickets and super-route allowance, were found not well-founded and were dismissed. The tribunal did not make any monetary award on those claims.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars contrary to s1 of the Employment Rights Act. For that failure, it considered it just and equitable to make an award under s38 of the Employment Act 2002 and ordered the respondent to pay £2,112, being four weeks’ pay at £528 per week. The total sum payable was recorded as £4,807.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was constructively unfairly dismissed. It awarded a basic award of £1,056, a compensatory award of £1,239, and £400 for loss of statutory rights; recoupment of benefits did not apply because the claimant did not claim or receive benefits. | Upheld | — | £2,695 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claims for unlawful deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay, parking tickets and super-route allowance were found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The respondent failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars contrary to s1 of the Employment Rights Act. The tribunal considered it just and equitable to award four weeks' pay under s38 of the Employment Act 2002, amounting to £2,112. | Upheld | — | £2,112 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,807
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,056
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,239
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.