Case 1303521/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Hingley v Hewitt Homes Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303521/2022
- Decision date
- 27 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hussain Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Hingley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Miss C Hingley’s claim for unlawful deductions from wages was well founded. It ordered Hewitt Homes Limited to pay £954.25 gross for the amount unlawfully deducted. It also found the holiday pay claim well founded and ordered payment of £226 gross for accrued holiday not taken.
The tribunal further found two breaches of contract. First, the respondent failed to pay mileage expenses and was ordered to pay £80 net in damages. Second, the respondent failed to secure an exemption for the Clean Air Zone as agreed and was ordered to pay £350 net in damages.
The written judgment also records that the respondent failed to give the claimant itemised pay statements required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 for the period 06/05/22 to 02/06/22. The record states that the full amount ordered was to be paid within 8 days and that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the unlawful deductions from wages claim well founded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £954.25. | Upheld | — | £954 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay claim well founded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £226 for accrued holiday not taken. | Upheld | — | £226 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim for failure to pay mileage expenses; damages of £80 net were ordered. | Upheld | — | £80 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim for failure to secure an exemption for the Clean Air Zone as agreed; damages of £350 net were ordered. | Upheld | — | £350 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to give itemised pay statements required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 during the period 06/05/22 to 02/06/22. The written record does not set out a separate monetary award for this finding. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,610
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.