Case 1303523/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Borgoyne v Hewitt Homes Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303523/2022
- Decision date
- 27 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hussain Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Borgoyne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Midlands West Employment Tribunal on 27 February 2023, before Employment Judge Hussain, Miss C Borgoyne succeeded in her complaint of unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal ordered Hewitt Homes Limited to pay £643.98 gross in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted.
The claimant also succeeded on holiday pay. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £226 gross for accrued holiday that had not been taken. The written record states that the full amount ordered was to be paid within 8 days, giving a total monetary award of £869.98 gross.
The judgment also records that the respondent failed to give the claimant itemised pay statements as required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 for the period 6 May 2022 to 2 June 2022. The judgment does not state any separate monetary figure for that point.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £643.98. | Upheld | — | £644 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well founded and ordered payment of £226 gross for accrued holiday not taken. | Upheld | — | £226 |
| Other | The judgment records that the respondent failed to give itemised pay statements as required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 for 6 May 2022 to 2 June 2022. No separate monetary award is stated for this point. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £870
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.