Case 1303526/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Tyler v RKAS Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303526/2019
- Decision date
- 10 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Tyler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Flood, sitting alone, heard the case by CVP on 10 February 2022 and recorded that the respondent did not attend. The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction of wages, finding that 5 weeks' unpaid wages were due, and ordered the respondent to pay £783.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's accrued holiday pay claim, describing it as well founded and awarding £93.96 for 12 days accrued but untaken holiday. It further found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £313.20 in respect of two weeks' notice pay.
Finally, the tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £469.80. The judgment states that the sums under paragraphs 1 and 2 were gross amounts, with the claimant responsible for income tax and National Insurance contributions. The bottom-line sum of the monetary awards recorded in the judgment is £1,640.96.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found 5 weeks of unpaid wages due and ordered payment of £783. | Upheld | — | £783 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claim for accrued holiday pay well founded and ordered £93.96 for 12 days accrued but untaken leave. | Upheld | — | £94 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded £313.20 for two weeks' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £313 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £469.80. | Upheld | — | £470 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,641
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.