Case 1303543/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Meadows v Old Rectory (Bramshall) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303543/2019
- Decision date
- 7 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Meadows
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal. It recorded that by letter dated 26/06/2019 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success and/or had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis the tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.
The reasons note that the claimant’s remaining claim(s) would proceed to hearing on 22/07/2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 37 after a letter dated 26/06/2019 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success and/or not being actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37
- No reasonable prospect of success
- Not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.