Case 1303543/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Cawley v Johnsons Cars Limited Heard — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303543/2021
- Decision date
- 13 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Cawley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Cawley brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Johnsons Cars Limited. The tribunal heard the case on 13 May 2022 before Employment Judge Hindmarch, with the Claimant appearing in person and the Respondent represented by Mr Dubb, solicitor.
The tribunal did not determine the merits of the dismissal itself. It found that the unfair dismissal claim was not presented within the relevant time limit and that the Claimant had not shown that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented in time.
On that basis, the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim and dismissed it.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was not presented within the relevant time limit, and that the Claimant had not shown it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time. The tribunal therefore held it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.