Case 1303552/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Webb Plastics Recycling (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303552/2021
- Decision date
- 26 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy Q.C.
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant, Y. Mahmood, was unfairly dismissed by Webb Plastics recycling (In Voluntary Liquidation). The respondent did not appear at the hearing, which took place at Birmingham by CVP on 26 July 2022 before Employment Judge Algazy QC.
The judgment records only the liability finding and the remedy. No further reasons are set out in the extracted text beyond the tribunal’s oral reasons having been given. The tribunal stated that the claimant was entitled to a basic award.
The basic award is recorded in the judgment as £6.015, which appears from the extracted text to be a formatting or OCR issue; the amount has therefore been treated as £6.01. No compensatory award, injury to feelings award, or interest is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment text states the basic award as £6.015; this appears to be a minor OCR/formatting issue. The award is treated here as £6.01. | Upheld | — | £6 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £6
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.