Case 1303573/2018 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Redditch BTL Properties Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1303573/2018
- Decision date
- 13 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richardson Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms C Goss, appeared in person. The respondent, Redditch BTL Properties Limited, did not appear. The Employment Tribunal sat at Birmingham on 13 September 2019 before Employment Judge Richardson and gave judgment on that date.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,311.57 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay 13 days' holiday pay and ordered payment of £962.00 gross. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax and National Insurance Contributions due on those sums.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with a statement of particulars of employment. Pursuant to s.38 Employment Act 2002, it ordered the respondent to pay the claimant 4 weeks' wages, quantified in the judgment as £2,074. The total monetary award from the judgment is £4,347.57.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,312 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £962 |
| Other | The tribunal also made an award under s.38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a statement of particulars of employment, expressed as 4 weeks' wages. | Upheld | — | £2,074 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,348
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.