Case 1303584/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Bartholomew v Precious Homes Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303584/2021
- Decision date
- 24 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Battisby
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Bartholomew
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 28 June 2022, the Tribunal gave Miss A Bartholomew an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 1 March 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Battisby ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment does not record any merits findings, liability findings, or monetary award. It also states that the hearing fixed for 2 September 2022 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify separate substantive claims or determine them on the merits; it records that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 1 March 2022 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.