Case 1303588/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Lisa Rawat v The Wickets At Wellington Limited Heard: by CVP in Birmingham — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303588/2023
- Decision date
- 9 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Codd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Lisa Rawat
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Codd found that Mrs Lisa Rawat had been dismissed by reason of redundancy on 9 February 2023. The respondent was The Wickets At Wellington Limited. The hearing was held by CVP in Birmingham on 25 October 2023.
Applying section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal determined that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. The judgment records the amount of that statutory redundancy payment as £3,570. No other claim or remedy is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal determined under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,570 after being dismissed by reason of redundancy on 9 February 2023. | Upheld | — | £3,570 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,570
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.