Case 1303604/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Gould v Staffordshire County Council & Others — 2019
- Case reference
- 1303604/2018
- Decision date
- 9 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Findlay
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Gould
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short Rule 52 dismissal. It records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Miss E Gould, against Staffordshire County Council and Others.
No findings are given on the substance of the pleaded claims, and the judgment does not record any liability decision, remedy assessment, or split of the proceedings by cause of action. The only outcome stated is that the case was dismissed because the claim was withdrawn.
The judgment is signed by Employment Judge Findlay on 9 December 2019. No lay members are listed, and no monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not give a separate merits decision on this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it does not give a separate merits decision on this claim. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.