Case 1303610/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Frost v Diamond Logistics Ltd - Adam Gaunt — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303610/2019
- Decision date
- 14 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Frost
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Flood on 14 February 2020. The respondent did not attend or defend the claim, and the tribunal made orders on the papers. The judgment records that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages, that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's accrued but untaken holiday entitlement.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £346.50 for the unlawful deduction from wages, £346.40 for breach of contract damages for notice, and £1,725.00 for the unpaid holiday entitlement. The judgment states that the sums under paragraphs 1 to 3 were gross amounts and that the claimant was responsible for any income tax and National Insurance contributions on them.
No separate award breakdown beyond those three sums is given, and the judgment does not record any additional remedy such as interest or injury to feelings. The total of the ordered sums is £2,417.90.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £346.50 for an unauthorised deduction from wages; the judgment states this is the gross amount. | Upheld | — | £347 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £346.40. | Upheld | — | £346 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of £1,725.00 for accrued but untaken holiday entitlement; the judgment states this is the gross amount. | Upheld | — | £1,725 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,418
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.