Case 1303615/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Macey (counsel) For the v Mr Chalotra (director) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1303615/2018
- Decision date
- 11 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Macey (counsel) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAfter a hearing in Birmingham on 7 March 2019, Employment Judge Perry recorded that the claimant's listed complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment identifies allegations against the second respondent that he had pressured the claimant to take a speeding ticket on his behalf and had made him work without pay outside his working hours, together with complaints of age discrimination, notice pay, holiday pay, and disability-related matters.
The judgment contains no findings on the merits of any of those complaints. It records no liability determination, no legal analysis beyond the procedural disposition, and no remedy or award, because the complaints were withdrawn and therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Part of para 1.1: allegation against the second respondent that he acted improperly and illegally by placing the claimant under pressure to take a speeding ticket on his behalf; the judgment does not assign a fuller statutory label. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Part of para 1.1: allegation that the claimant was made to work without pay outside his work hours. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Listed in para 1.2 and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers in para 1.2 to a complaint for notice pay; breach of contract is the closest fit, but the judgment does not spell out the legal basis. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Listed in para 1.2 and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Para 1.3 refers to a complaint based on an assertion that the claimant was a person with a disability, with wording that also mentions stress and depression. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.