Case 1303644/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr B Fairfax — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303644/2019
- Decision date
- 16 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the reconsideration hearing on 15 October 2020, the tribunal exercised its powers under Rule 70, revoked the judgment of 5 March 2020 as amended on 20 July 2020, and substituted a new judgment. The hearing was conducted by CVP before Employment Judge Lloyd, with both parties appearing in person.
By consent, the parties agreed that the respondent would pay the claimant £400 in full and final settlement of all claims made by the claimant against the respondent and against any undertaking conducted by him or on his behalf. The sum was paid at the hearing.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims were fully and finally satisfied, that the claimant confirmed this in writing, and that no further claims or proceedings would be pursued. The claimant also undertook to withdraw any enforcement proceedings and requested that no enforcement fees be levied on the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The reconsideration judgment does not identify the underlying claim particulars; this claim type is inferred from the case listing. The judgment records a full and final settlement by consent. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The reconsideration judgment does not identify the underlying claim particulars; this claim type is inferred from the case listing. The judgment records a full and final settlement by consent. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £400
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 70
- Rules 70-73
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.