Case 1303651/2019 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Mr N Thornsby (solicitor advocate) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303651/2019
- Decision date
- 4 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was the final merits hearing in Mr D Walton's claim against Arrow Services (Midlands) Limited before Employment Judge Perry sitting alone on 4 March 2020 at Centre City Tower, Birmingham. The respondent's name was amended by agreement to match the title of the case.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim. It found that the claimant did not have the qualifying service needed to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim, and it also found that he had not shown he was dismissed because he had asserted a statutory right. The written record states that the claim was not well founded and was dismissed, and that reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant did not have qualifying service to bring an unfair dismissal claim and had not shown that he was dismissed by reason of having asserted a statutory right. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.