Case 1303670/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Clift, lay representative For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303670/2019
- Decision date
- 19 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richardson Signed
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr M Clift, lay representative For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records claims by Mrs A Jones against Mr A Billingham and Mrs P Billingham trading as Lapal House Residential Care Home. The listing categories identify breach of contract and unfair dismissal, but the judgment itself does not set out the factual background or any substantive findings on those claims.
Employment Judge Richardson recorded that terms had been agreed between the parties and that, on withdrawal by the claimant, the claim was dismissed. The tribunal made no order for costs and recorded no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Listed as an unfair dismissal claim; the judgment records that terms had been agreed between the parties and, on withdrawal by the claimant, the claim was dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Listed as a breach of contract claim; the judgment records that terms had been agreed between the parties and, on withdrawal by the claimant, the claim was dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.