Case 1303674/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Kelly v Peakhouse Foods Ltd (In Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1303674/2022
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Kelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 8 July 2025, the Tribunal gave Mr J Kelly an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The Tribunal recorded that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Wedderspoon struck out the claim on 25 July 2025. The judgment does not determine the substantive merits of the underlying claim and does not record any award of remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause of action. It records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing following the Tribunal's letter dated 8 July 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.