Case 1303688/2021 · Employment Tribunal
KYLE CLAYTON-BARKER v Nationwide Silo Access Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303688/2021
- Decision date
- 8 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge MANLEY Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
KYLE CLAYTON-BARKER
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment concerned a procedural application rather than the merits of the underlying employment claims. The Respondent sought an extension of time to present its response, but Employment Judge Manley refused that application pursuant to Rule 20 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
As a result, the Respondent's response was rejected pursuant to Rule 18. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the claimant's unfair dismissal or working time complaints, and it does not assess liability or remedy for those underlying claims.
The Tribunal nevertheless permitted the Respondent to take part in the proceedings to a limited extent under Rule 21(3), including attending the hearing, cross-examining the Claimant, and advancing oral submissions. No monetary award is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment deals only with the Respondent's application for an extension of time to present its response. That application was refused under Rule 20 and the response was rejected under Rule 18. No substantive liability decision on the underlying claims is recorded in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.