Case 1303696/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Skinlo v Cross Green Farm Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1303696/2021
- Decision date
- 24 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mensah
- Venue
- Birmingham West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Skinlo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case remotely before Judge L Mensah. It recorded the respondent as Cross Green Farm Limited, identified from the ACAS certificate and the ET1. The respondent did not attend. Miss A Skinlo succeeded on both claims brought before the tribunal.
The tribunal found that the claimant’s holiday pay claim was made out under the Working Time Regulations 1998. It ordered the respondent to pay £368.57 gross for untaken, accrued and carried-over holiday due to sickness, covering the full year 2020 and accrued untaken holiday up to 15 July 2021, payable within 14 days.
The tribunal also found that the claimant’s claim for failure to provide particulars of employment under Part 1, section 1 of the Employment Rights Act was made out. It ordered a further £300 gross, also payable within 14 days. The orders total £668.57 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Holiday pay claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998; the tribunal ordered £368.57 gross for untaken, accrued and carried-over holiday due to sickness, covering the full year 2020 and accrued untaken holiday up to 15.07.2021. | Upheld | — | £369 |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide particulars of employment under Part 1, section 1 of the Employment Rights Act; the tribunal ordered £300 gross. | Upheld | — | £300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £669
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Working Time Regulations 1998
- Employment Rights Act 1996, Part 1 section 1
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.