Case 1303713/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Roberts v Fuse Assurance Solutions Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1303713/2019
- Decision date
- 11 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Roberts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr J Roberts against Fuse Assurance Solutions Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered payment of £719.18 for 11 days' wages in March 2018 and £148.12 for 11 days' statutory sick pay.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded £457.66 as damages for 7 days' notice pay.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £261.52 for 4 days' holiday pay. The hearing listed for 17 October 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award was stated to comprise £719.18 for 11 days' wages in March 2018 and £148.12 for 11 days' statutory sick pay. | Upheld | — | £867 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for 7 days' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £458 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, quantified as 4 days' holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £262 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,586
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.