Case 1303719/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Glogowska v F.A. Gill Limited (In Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1303719/2019
- Decision date
- 13 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richardson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Glogowska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 7 February 2020, Employment Judge Richardson sitting alone at Birmingham heard the matter in private. The judgment records only preliminary rulings. Time was extended for the claimant's claims brought under sections 13, 26 and 27 of the Equality Act 2010; the extracted text says 'Equality Act 2020', which appears to be a typographical error in the source text.
The tribunal also stated that there was no jurisdictional issue in relation to the claimant's untaken holiday entitlement. The extracted judgment does not record any merits findings, liability decision, or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Procedural ruling only: time was extended for the claimant's claims brought under sections 13, 26 and 27 of the Equality Act 2010. The extracted text says 'Equality Act 2020', which appears to be a typographical error in the source text. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Procedural ruling only: the tribunal recorded that there was no jurisdictional issue in relation to the claimant's untaken holiday entitlement. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.